Missouri · federal district court

Artificial Intelligence notice to filers

By presenting any pleading, written motion or other paper, attorneys and self-represented parties acknowledge they are responsible for its contents, including any portion generated with artificial intelligence. The court points to Rule 11(b) and asks for nothing further.

Tracker entry · Missouri

  1. Court. U.S. District Court, Eastern District of MissouriCOURT
  2. Level. federal district courtLEVEL
  3. Date. no date published on the pageDATED
  4. What it requires. verification dutyREQUIRES
  5. Source. Read the documentSOURCE

Last checked · we opened the source on that day and drew the requirement above from its text.

This is the shortest entry in the tracker, and the shape of it is the point. The district publishes one paragraph, and that paragraph adds no new procedure. It restates Rule 11(b) and then names artificial intelligence inside it.

Read that way, a filer in this district is in the same position as a filer who delegated a draft to anyone else. What is signed is owned. There is no disclosure requirement and no certification form on the page we read.

This entry is descriptive, not legal advice. It records what one document says. Read the order that governs your own division before you rely on any of it, and check whether it has changed since the date above.

Back to every jurisdiction in the tracker, or readhow to check an AI citation before you file.

Show me on one of my files →

See what checking every citation before it renders looks like on your own file.

Show me on my files