Florida · federal district court · 2026

Adeeb v. Roxtec, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida, 26 January 2026 to 30 January 2026. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from 2 documents on file.

Case record · M.D. Fla.

  1. Court. District Court, M.D. FloridaCOURT
  2. Level. federal district courtLEVEL
  3. Dates. 26 January 2026 to 30 January 2026DATED
  4. Docket. No. 8:25-cv-02571DOCKET
  5. Judge. William Frederic JungJUDGE
  6. Documents. 2 documents, 2 passages quoted belowON FILE
  7. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Docket entry 56, 30 January 2026 · source

Docket text. ENDORSED ORDER granting 51 Motion to Dismiss, due to hallucinated citations. The Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint if he wishes, within 21 days. The second amended complaint may not exceed 40 pages in length, may not attach superfluous exhibits, and must allege legal causes of action, and may not cite legal case citations. Any further citation of false sources will result in dismissal with prejudice. Plaintiff may wish to research Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and review the case (available on Google) Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009). Plaintiff is advised that crafting a complaint in federal court is difficult even for trained lawyers who do it all the time. Several offices are available which might offer free assistance, such as Bay Area Volunteer Legal Services, (800) 625-2257. If filing a second amended complaint, Plaintiff should review the U.S. Eleventh Circuit's teachings on "shotgun pleadings." The show cause order is discharged. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/30/2026. (Jung, William) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

ENDORSED ORDER granting 51 Motion to Dismiss, due to hallucinated citations. The Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint if he wishes, within 21 days.

Docket entry 53, 26 January 2026 · source

Docket text. ENDORSED ORDER to show cause re. false citations employed as to David Adeeb. The Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 51) states examples of Plaintiff using false or "made up" citations (possibly AI-induced "hallucinated" citations). Plaintiff should address and explain this issue in detail and SHOW CAUSE by filing on this docket within 14 days why this would not support case sanctions. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/26/2026. (Jung, William) (Entered: 01/26/2026)

The Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 51) states examples of Plaintiff using false or "made up" citations (possibly AI-induced "hallucinated" citations). Plaintiff should address and explain this issue in detail and SHOW CAUSE by filing on this docket within 14 days why this would not support case sanctions.

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from District Court, M.D. Florida, from Florida, or from 2026. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files