Florida · federal district court · 2025

Crespo v. Tesla, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida, 30 June 2025. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.

Case record · S.D. Fla.

  1. Court. District Court, S.D. FloridaCOURT
  2. Level. federal district courtLEVEL
  3. Date. 30 June 2025DATED
  4. Docket. No. 9:25-cv-80129DOCKET
  5. Judge. Donald M. MiddlebrooksJUDGE
  6. Documents. one document, 1 passage quoted belowON FILE
  7. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Docket entry 88, 30 June 2025 · source

Docket text. SECOND ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND ON THE SUBMISSION OF FAKE, HALLUCINATED CASES BY THE PRO SE PLAINTIFF LEONARDO CRESPO denying 61 Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories; denying 62 Motion to Compel Further Responses To First Set Of Requests for Admission; denying 63 Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents Responsive To First Request for Production; denying 81 Motion to Produce to Produce Former Employee's Contact Information and; denying 81 MOTION Reasonable Expenses; denying as moot 82 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 85 Motion for Leave to File Corrected File Briefs. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 6/30/2025. See attached document for full details. (swr) (Entered: 06/30/2025)

SECOND ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND ON THE SUBMISSION OF FAKE, HALLUCINATED CASES BY THE PRO SE PLAINTIFF LEONARDO CRESPO denying 61 Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories; denying 62 Motion to Compel Further Responses To First Set Of Requests for Admission; denying 63 Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents Responsive To First Request for Production; denying 81 Motion to Produce to Produce Former Employee's Contact Information and; denying 81 MOTION Reasonable Expenses; denying as moot 82 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 85 Motion for Leave to File Corrected File Briefs. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 6/30/2025.

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from District Court, S.D. Florida, from Florida, or from 2025. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files