ApodictaShow me on my files

Mississippi · federal district court · 2026

Harris v. Bank of America

District Court, N.D. Mississippi, 30 July 2026. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.

Case record · N.D. Miss.

  1. Court. District Court, N.D. MississippiCOURT
  2. Level. federal district courtLEVEL
  3. Date. 30 July 2026DATED
  4. Docket. No. 3:25-cv-00328DOCKET
  5. Judge. Michael P. MillsJUDGE
  6. Documents. one document, 2 passages quoted belowON FILE
  7. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Docket entry 20, 30 July 2026 · source · PDF · 5 pages

Docket text. MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Michael P. Mills on 7/30/2026. (rru)

19, 2021)” to support his claims against BANA. These two cited Northern District of Mississippi Opinions were unable to be found by this Court, and are likely fictitious citations ge nerated by artificial intelligence. Neither a search of the Westlaw citations or the party names brings up any corresponding case in the Northern District.

Due to his pro se nature, the Court will not sanction Mr. Harris, but he is put on notice and will not be given the same grace if he refiles his lawsuit and cites to hallucinated case law again. Case: 3:25-cv-00328-MPM-JMV Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/30/26 5 of 5 PageID #: 73

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from District Court, N.D. Mississippi, from Mississippi, or from 2026. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on one of my filesTry the gate
Show me on my files