ApodictaShow me on my files

Arizona · federal district court · 2025

Hyneman v. PRA Events Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona, 16 December 2025. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.

Case record · D. Ariz.

  1. Court. District Court, D. ArizonaCOURT
  2. Level. federal district courtLEVEL
  3. Date. 16 December 2025DATED
  4. Docket. No. 4:23-cv-00497DOCKET
  5. Judge. Raner Christercunean CollinsJUDGE
  6. Documents. one document, 1 passage quoted belowON FILE
  7. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Docket entry 88, 16 December 2025 · source

Docket text. SCHEDULING ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting 87 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time Of Discovery Deadlines . Discovery due by 3/31/2026. Dispositive motions due by 4/30/2026. Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/15/2026. The parties are warned that unfounded or unsupported AI-generated arguments and citations to non-existent cases is strictly prohibited and may result in sanctions. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 12/16/2025. (See attached Order for complete information.) (DLV) (Entered: 12/16/2025)

Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/15/2026. The parties are warned that unfounded or unsupported AI-generated arguments and citations to non-existent cases is strictly prohibited and may result in sanctions. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 12/16/2025.

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from District Court, D. Arizona, from Arizona, or from 2025. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on one of my filesTry the gate
Show me on my files