Texas · state appellate court · 2014

Joseph Edward Johnson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin), 31 July 2014. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.

Case record · Tex. App.-Austin

  1. Court. Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)COURT
  2. Level. state appellate courtLEVEL
  3. Date. 31 July 2014DATED
  4. Docket. No. 03-13-00748-CRDOCKET
  5. Documents. one document, 1 passage quoted belowON FILE
  6. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Published opinion, 31 July 2014 · source · PDF · 8 pages

DVDs containing the video recordings were admitted into evidence. On cross- examination, Hensley acknowledged that he was unaware that B.T. had experienced hallucinations and conceded that if he knew an alleged victim had hallucinations it could change the way he thought about the case. 4 Holland, the SANE nurse, testified that B.T. informed her that Johnson “had touched her breast, put his mouth on her sexual organs, put his fingers inside of her sexual organs, touched her bottom” and “tried to get her to do a hand job on him.” Holland explained that she did not find7 any injuries to B.T.’s sexual organ during her examination.

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin), from Texas, or from 2014. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files