ApodictaShow me on my files

Ohio · state appellate court · 2025

State ex rel. Eldridge v. Kilbane

Ohio Court of Appeals, 31 October 2025. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.

Case record · Ohio Ct. App.

  1. Court. Ohio Court of AppealsCOURT
  2. Level. state appellate courtLEVEL
  3. Date. 31 October 2025DATED
  4. Docket. No. 115338DOCKET
  5. Judge. RyanJUDGE
  6. Reporter. 2025 Ohio 5053CITE
  7. Documents. one document, 2 passages quoted belowON FILE
  8. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Published opinion, 31 October 2025 · source · PDF · 10 pages

Eldridge also claimed that her attorney did not receive proper notice and that she was prohibited from presenting evidence. In this brief in opposition, Eldridge acknowledged that her writ petition contained citation errors and hallucinated cases because she “relied on assistance that proved inad equate” and requested leave to amend her petition with correct legal authority.1 The judge filed a reply brief on September 15, 2025. For the following reasons, this court grants the respondent’s motion to dismiss.

On April 10, 2023, Soretha commenced a forcible entry and detaine r action against her father, Eldridge v. Eldridge, 1 A “hallucinated case” is a made -up, fictitious case generated by “artificial intelligence, AI.” Cleveland M.C. No.

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from Ohio Court of Appeals, from Ohio, or from 2025. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on one of my filesTry the gate
Show me on my files