Washington · 1 court
AI-hallucinated citation decisions in Washington
5 decisions and docket orders, 2025 to 2026, from 1 court in Washington, in which a court addressed authority that did not exist. Each links the court's own words and the source document.
Retrieved from CourtListener public records.
Courts in Washington
Every record, newest first
| Date | Case | Court | The text mentions | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| King v. AT&T Corp No. 2:25-cv-02270 | W.D. Wash. | a warning or admonition, dismissal, a self-represented party, Rule 11 | CourtListener | |
| LeDoux v. Outliers Inc No. 3:24-cv-05808 | W.D. Wash. | ChatGPT, Claude, dismissal, Rule 11 | CourtListener | |
| El Bitar v. Wamsley No. 2:26-cv-00919 | W.D. Wash. | Gemini / Bard, Rule 11, sanctions, an order to show cause | CourtListener | |
| Button v. Jimison No. 3:25-cv-05622 | W.D. Wash. | a warning or admonition, dismissal, attorney's fees or costs, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| Nelson v. Washington Board of Industrial No. 3:25-cv-05551 | W.D. Wash. | a warning or admonition, Rule 11, sanctions | CourtListener |
The whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations. For what courts and bars in Washington require of a filing with AI in it, see the court AI orders tracker.